Where did I go right?

So, here I was writing off topic about love and how its crazy and how it makes one vulnerable and if you're not lucky enough, you'll find yourself miserable as well. Seriously, what is the right thing to do? Is there ever a safe way to go? complicated is an understatement. I can imagine how hard it is for someone who hates me for thinking that I stole someone from (that person). Now I am miserable. He writes all about it in his blog. I am not a fancy writer, but I get it. Well let me tell you something, I feel for you too. You can't force someone to grow up.

Where did I go right? At first this hilary duff song didn't make any sense but then I figured what it meant to me. I was just reading the entire lyrics and, yeah, now I understand. Extremely appropriate. I also learned about the logical consequence of catch 22, first heard about it in the show LA ink. It means, you are in a situation where you dont want to be involved but you feel like you cant do anything about it because youre already in it. I am happy, but if there are some people involved and both of you just cant seem to make ends meet, would this love ever go somewhere? anywhere. I dread for the time that youd call it off but I wanted to be positive about it, cognitive, as you would say. I made a couple of turns along the road as an attempt to get back on where I first started. But at some point, I no longer knew who was driving. It could only be a matter of time before the road gets bumpy. I hate it when that happens.

Enough

I dont even know where to start. I'd like to think that 5 or 6 years from now, i look back at this moment and just laugh about how I got tangled up into this web of lies and fragments of truth that shouldn't have been there because its very presence just makes it all hard to turn things around. I never knew "love" could be so painful and stupid sometimes. Some people might say, been there done that. Well, I say, I want to skip the tough parts and just get back on track. I am not a bad person, I had no intention of making someone miserable to my advantage, its like what he said, being a third party, is bullshit!-heartless and pointless. I guess I'm never gonna be good enough for anyone. People are always looking for something more, well, I don't have more, I can only give myself. When you give all of yourself, and that other person still wants something more, what is there left for you? Which is why I felt like my entire body just got flushed down to the drain my heart went down with it. I have no objections, Let life take its course.

Testing by cadbury26

Make your own| Clone and edit

NO more non sense

All those recitation wont be getting me anywhere, I need to pass the midterms and the finals to get through 1st semester. It is possible to cover the pointers for the exam but I am extremely nervous, and I am bad in planning my schedule in studying all law subjects.

Political law is still kind of a blur, I am having trouble picking up some of the major points in the book and the discussion although concrete is still a handful. Its funny that its like decoding a secret code and that the author of the consti book was a friend of shakespeare. Sigh! I just hope ill be able to pull through with this.

Think like any justice would?

It was a surprisingly interactive day for me today. Nothing much to say on Civil code, we were on article 36 psychological incapacitation as a ground for legal separation or annulment of marriage. I get the idea but I have yet to read the cases to really substantiate on the matter and the issues.

I was so pumped up again on criminal law today as we digest and discuss the circumstances affecing criminal liability (justifying circumstances) Our professor, fiscal Soriano was i think pleased in a non obvious way about how Ive justified the situation she gave on defense of a stranger. I know how important it is to be aware of certain requisites of these legal provisions because those were basically the baselines of how things should be dealt with. She said I would answer like any judge would-so i took that one as a compliment-I guess. That was a commendation and it meant a lot because that would only mean that I am finally understanding what I am rreading. Not to brag but the situations given were a no brainer, and a nothing like a good common sense would answer the questions.

i am hoping that I could keep it up in all my subjects.

Running in circles

I am physically and mentally drained.
I now have to figure out how I can get my mojo back, but I am going nowhere with it.
Some people can be vile, there are things in life that are just so hard to explain.
I feel like I am under a microscope and some people will do anything to crush me. If its all in my mind, i need professional help.
I guess, I enjoy being alone because it helps me think.
I am free to just stay calm and be free from stress.
Be underrated
be low profile
Free to dream
Live the life
feel Lucky
Defy anything-everything
build-up confidence
Recharge
I imagine looking at the beach and smelling the fresh cool breeze touch my face

cases and articles

Surprisingly, I am starting to get the hang of reading my law books. It gets a little frustrating at times, but they are tolerable. I sure do hope my patience will improve after indulging myself into honing my reading skill. Speaking of reading, I took the liberty of downloading case files from the class yahoo group page for our constitutional 1 assignment, and boy, were those cases lengthy. I read about the Guingona vs. Carague case, it was about questioning the unconstitutionality of a certain general appropriations act provision, and how there was a political question that was proper for the congress and senate to address. Whether a certain sum be appropriated for national debt services or that an appropriation should only be alloted for the principal fees and other bank charges excluding the debt services. So far, that was what i understood.

Next up, was the Luna vs Court of Appeals case. This case is somewhat similar to the Daoang case or any child custody case for that matter. Clearly this case had that Renvoi/referring back principle going on, because it was tossed up from the lower court then elevated to the higher court, then eventually the SC would refer it back to the lower court ordering the latter to issue a writ of execution. Now this is where it gets really interesting. The child in question vented out on a private hearing when asked by the appointed psychologist about whether she likes to stay with her biological parents, wherein, the child desisted and told the doctor that her real parents are hurting her and pretending that they love here only because they want her[child] on their side. She insisted further that she would kill herself if she will be in custody with her biological parents. The judge addressed this issue like any mother or parent would have. The custody went to the guardian/grandparents. The SC initially contested that the lower court should have pushed through executing the order, but due to the child's statement it was a valid supervening cause sufficient to amending the ruling,I think it is also worthy of noting that the state may have acted upon the doctrine of parens patriae.